Moon and Mars Redux

The Moon and Mars were in conjunction once again last night, separated by about 1º. I happened to notice it through the trees in the west as I was bringing the dog in at about 1 AM. I had just come out of the studio and had taken a sleeping pill or I’d have been right out there with at least a telephoto lens. Fortunately someone else was on the ball I dropped. 🙂

Gray Days and the 300 ft Man

Ok, now that the weather has been nice and cool in the evenings, nature has seen fit to cloud over the sky and deliver off and on rain for the last 10 days. Go figure that. At anyrate, all this "me time" has allowed me to finally crack open a book I’d been pining to read for sometime…

The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report by Timothy Ferris.

For sometime I’ve had questions and ideas mulling around in my brain regarding the nature of the universe based on bits and pieces of information gleaned from various sources (primarily Sky & Telescope, Scientific American and the like). Most of the magazine material I’ve read simply deals with emerging ideas of specific aspects of specific theories. So not having ANY formal education in cosmology or quantum physics myself, I was thinking things like, "Well why not this?" and "If that’s true then how come this?" I know just enough to be dangerous (read follow along), but far too little to participate intellectually and or make any conclusions on my own. Let me give you an example of one of the naive notions that had been bothering me.

We all accept that the universe is expanding in that everything is moving away from everything else (let me go on for a minute here). If that were the case, shouldn’t it follow that the spaces between the atoms and molecules that constitute my body are expanding as well? So how can we possibly detect expansion when the fundamental units (in this instance space/time) are expanding along with us? Let me try and illustrate this.

Imagine yourself in a windowless white room, perfectly square and floating in space. Now we’re gonna sprinkle some pixie dust and this is going to cause the room (and you the resident… um… nude geonaut) to expand in size by a factor of 50. At the end of the experiment you are asked to describe any changes you noticed during your time in the box. As far as you can tell, nothing happened. The box grew, you grew… but without any outside referrence or gravity/orientation/clothing cues, things appear to be exactly the same. By your observation nothing has happened. So you come outside to join the team for a coffee only to discover you are now 300 feet tall!

Now on the surface this sounds a reasonable conclusion does it not? If we are in a universe that is uniformly expanding on all scales this should be true. Of course I know its obviously not that simple, or else it would be. Some of things that I thought to consider were:

  • When referring to the expansion of the universe, is it space-time that is actually expanding or is space-time a subset of a larger universe container which is expanding (multiple dimensions?).
  • Is expansion adding volume on all scales (from the quantum domain up to large scale structures like galaxy superclusters)?
  • Is expansion happening uniformly across these different structures?
  • What role does/can gravity (as a weak force) play in the expansion of the universe?
  • Is gravity a feature (subset) of space-time contained therein or is it a player on the field with space-time influencing cosmic expansion?

Ok, I’m beginning to confuse myself here (yes I probably have far too much spare time on my hands). Needless to say my thought experiment fails in the "real universe." Come to find out, the rate (velocity) of expansion of the universe is in fact retarded locally around large scale structures like galaxy clusters. Down on the level of say a planet, a person… a boson… gravity is pretty much irrelevant. We live in an expanding universe filled with all kinds of forces that influence the expansion differently on different scales; strong, weak, electromagnetic, gravitational… sounds like there could be some kind of… unified…field? …theory? in all this. I’m kidding. I wouldn’t even presume to go anywhere near that.

My point is The Whole Shebang: A State-of-the-Universe(s) Report by Timothy Ferris –– excellent read! The author is able to take dry scientific information and present it in an easy-to-grasp, understandable and interesting text. So if you’re at all interested in finding out the difference between a WIMP and a MACHO, or examining the finer points of Supersymmetry and String Theory, or just curious as to whether or not non-baryonic matter really makes up 90% of the universe… grab this book.

Hoping for clear skies soon! …but I digress.

December 05 Desktop Images

These desktop images are at a resolution of 1680 x 1050 — which is what I run on my Apple Cinema Display. Click on an image and after it loads, right-click it to save it to your desktop.

Enjoy!


These images may have been light/color enhanced and/or sharpened in accordance with my own personal aesthetic ideas and should not be used for scientific purposes requiring raw image data.


Hubble Images & Misc Mars

061302 2001-10-a
2003-24-a 2003-28-a
2005-01-a 2005-11-a
2005-20-a 2005-30-a
crab galaxy
helix hudf
s109e5707 mars_hst_big
10-jg-04-hills-a074r1 pia07855_plusrover-a667r1
pia07997_plusrover-a667r1 vikinglander2-2

Imaged Mars tonight

It was about 65º F and breezy tonight with fast-moving intermittent clouds (low-level Cumulus?). I did about 10 runs with the camera, refocusing before each run. The reason I do this is because it’s close to impossible to tell if I’m in focus with Mars unless I can make out some surface details — which is close to impossible on my red-screened iBook using the Meade LPI imager. I had similar trouble with Jupiter earlier this year and I learned that by refocusing before every exposure I give myself the best chance of hitting one right on.

Here is the image from tonight’s optimum run. It’s a stack of 250 frames.

click for larger

Notice the “tan” area in the upper left quarter of the image. I tried to find current information regarding dust storm activity on Mars but I was not able to — or I just didn’t look long enough. I would be interested in knowing if this is indeed a dust storm or just an artifact introduced somewhere along the line in my imaging/processing sequence.

While we’re on about Mars, take a look at these synthesized images of the rovers on Mars. The images were created using a photorealistic model of the rover and Mars surface images shot by the rover. The size of the rover in the image is approximately correct and was based on the size of the rover tracks in the image. I think I’m going to add the color shots to desktop images I’m currently compiling for December.

They really fire the imagination!

Experiences in Urban Backyard Astronomy